The talks published in the press, the result of intelligence work CISEN and Navy, did not really have a silver bullet to prove a criminal relationship between Mrs. Del Castillo and Guzmán. A federal official explained that these dialogues, once prosecuted, enter research as pieces of a puzzle. With the information I had the PGR, he suggested, those conversations would corroborating and confirming suspicions that the links between the two were more than cyclical business. The media have served as vehicles of excellence to give a pretext to the PGR to open new lines of research from published recordings.
When the spotlight of research are removed and the whirlwind that raised dissipates Several questions remain unanswered. Why, if the recordings are part of the investigation and were supposed to wiretaps authorized by a judge, they were disseminated through the press. Why, if they can be used in the preliminary investigation were given to the press some of the hottest segments and emotionally disturbing. The question remains whether, when the PGR announced that incorporate in the investigation, there is a possibility that they were illegally obtained recordings, or if there is a hidden, personal or research directly related interest. In any case, the result of materials that have to do with his heart, including discussions with a personal tone, have created the impression that it did have to do with a criminal. That is, the popular judgment found guilty.
At this point, it was a wise government to approach the issue postharvest El Chapo in the entertainment industry, which they gave air to the topic They filled all public spaces and prevented an asset quickly become a problem for the lack of official credibility, it has become a boomerang. Bring the people’s court to Mrs. Del Castillo, is permeated guilty. Failure to demonstrate the PGR crimes for which he is being investigated and proceed against them, but even if it is reached, in other areas of government they did enormous damage to the process. Madame de Castillo is a violation of their fundamental rights.
It is not yet a formal accusation is built against them, and they are standing pillars for which it is alleged, should it be the process, a violation to due process. The case of Mrs. Del Castillo is similar to the French Florence Cassez, convicted of kidnapping and organized crime, whom the Supreme Court freed three years ago on the grounds that it had violated their fundamental rights. The decision was based on the opinion of the minister Arturo Zaldivar, who describe how the French rights were violated, called the “corrupting effect”.
Among the circumstances that are considered within the ” corrupting effect “, found that” the conduct of the authority has caused suggestive evidence incriminating conditions that lead to the lack of reliability of the evidentiary material “and that” the conduct of the authority impact on the rights of the accused, so that is affected in total defense the right way and leave it defenseless. ” This leads to the presumption of innocence as treatment rule is violated, so that the defendant receives a fair trial
The Zaldivar Minister said in one of its central claims. “Given the importance of criminal charge, the Constitution gives the accused a number of key to ensure that a fair trial takes place against rights. However, these rights are useless when the authorities investigate the crime perform various actions that aim to publicly expose someone as responsible for the offense. “
Ms. Del Castillo is not Mrs. Cassez . The first has not even been charged with anything, while the second had already been sentenced. However, what the Supreme Court took as proof that their rights were violated, what is popularly known as “assembly”, a recreation of his capture, is less severe, it can be argued that the two weeks of media lynching against the actress. If it were to be charged and prosecuted or not, is irrelevant in the public sphere, where he has been sentenced. Guilty
[email protected]
twitter:rivapa
The comments in the section above are poured are the responsibility of the participants. Help us to maintain a healthy exchange of ideas, denounced by a “click” on the flag icon, each entry it deems inappropriate. If the comment does not comply with RULES , will be removed. Click here for the rules .
Welcome to our feedback service. We invite you to analyze, comment on and question the articles and reports published by El Diario. To maintain a healthy exchange of ideas to all our users, we need to follow the rules that we detail below. By participating in the feedback service you accept the application of these rules.
You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Do not intentionally publish content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of a third person.
No disseminate defamatory, obscene or aggressive that violates the right of a third person to privacy according to municipal, state, federal or even international or is deemed inappropriate. It indemnify Publications Paso del Norte (*), its employees and affiliates of each and every one of the claims and / or damages (including, but not limited to attorneys’ fees) that are submitted by third parties in relation to the content you published. He did not write content that discriminate against others because of their gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, disability or any other category.
You understand and agree that The Journal is not responsible for content posted by third parties.
it is his understanding that the discussion forums, El Diario published oversees the content and reserves the right to remove, edit or alter content that seems inappropriate for any reason without consent of the author . We reserve the right according to our own discretion to withdraw a user the right to publish content on our site.
You understand and agree that the discussion forums should be used for non-commercial purposes.
request resources or financial support. It will not promote commercial enterprises or perform any commercial activities in our discussion forums.
You understand and agree that the use of any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.
El Diario in no way endorses the broadcast content users, and it can not be made responsible for its accuracy.
With every content that you post, given to The Journal without paying royalties irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or part worldwide and to incorporate them in their work in any way now known or hereafter developed.
No comments:
Post a Comment