The TV vs film is a discussion that takes time and has shown that calling the small TV girl, is a wrong appellation. It is true that this type of production have evolved in form and substance and, painfully, cinema has been entrenched in recycling, redefine and not risk (in many cases within the industry that moves millions).
“In the 50 years I’ve been working in this profession, this is the worst time of all. I think television now enjoys his life. The film, however, is at worst “was one of his sentences in an interview with the British newspaper ‘The Independent’.
Many might think that the star of ‘The graduate ‘, among others, is breathing through the wound or expressing an opinion born of a new generation stage, your complaint about the timing of production and lack of risk in some of the film projects, it reflects the way some productions are trying to win over new audiences and also fight technology, piracy and, now, of course, against the creative freedom offered by the new TV.
Although television It does not escape this context: a series may be on the verge of cancellation if not up to scratch in the number of viewers, the truth is if you have shown a transformation and evolution radical positive,
Hoffman
may have to look elsewhere and other cinemas, to exorcise their anger, which is not new, but (given the weight that left Hollywood) show that something needs to be changed on However, if he says the man who starred in ‘Luck’. a number that was not very successful, but gave empowerment to express themselves about the new comparison between film and TV
Andres Hoyos Vargas
Culture and Entertainment
No comments:
Post a Comment